Back to Home
Non-Device CDS · 21st Century Cures Act

Non-Device CDS
Regulatory Framework

Precision Analgesia is designed from the ground up to meet all four FDA criteria for Non-Device Clinical Decision Support — a self-assessed classification, pending confirmatory review by regulatory counsel, aimed at avoiding 510(k) clearance requirements while maintaining the highest standard of clinical transparency.

Classification

Non-Device CDS (self-assessed)

21st Century Cures Act — pending counsel review

510(k) Required?

Not Anticipated

Pending confirmatory classification memo

Validation

Yale — Planned, July 2026

Addiction Medicine Fellowship

Non-Device CDS / 21st Century Cures Act

Four-Criteria FDA Analysis

Software is exempt from device regulation if it meets all four criteria. A caution finding requires additional counsel review; it does not automatically disqualify classification.

A

Not a medical image or signal processor

PASS

The software does not acquire, process, or analyze medical images (X-ray, MRI, CT), in vitro diagnostic signals, or physiological signals from a connected device. All inputs are entered manually by the clinician or pulled from structured EHR fields.

No image processing. No waveform analysis. No device connectivity. All inputs are discretized clinical parameters.

B

Intended for use by licensed healthcare professionals

PASS

The product is explicitly designed for, and marketed exclusively to, licensed healthcare professionals — attending physicians, nurse practitioners, physician assistants, and clinical pharmacists operating within institutional EHR environments.

HCP-only design. Mandatory clinical responsibility acknowledgment on every launch. No consumer-facing features.

C

Displays clinical information for independent HCP review

PASS

Every recommendation is accompanied by the full formula, data inputs, intermediate calculations, and the source guideline (CDC 2022, NCCN 2025, AGS Beers Criteria). The "Algorithm Transparency" and "Citations" interfaces show the complete derivation — not just the output.

Full derivation displayed. Every recommendation hyperlinked to published source. Zero black-box outputs.

D

HCP can independently verify the basis without relying on the software

PASS — BY DESIGN

The primary classification criterion. The statute requires that the software "enables such health care professional to independently review the basis for such recommendations so that it is not the intent that such health care professional rely primarily on any such recommendations to make a clinical diagnosis or treatment decision."

Supportive Design Features

  • • MME calculations: full formula shown inline
  • • GFR gating: threshold and rationale displayed
  • • Methadone PK: tiered ratios with APS/NCCN source
  • • OIRD scoring: all 14 factors individually shown
  • • One-click link to every source guideline
  • • Safety gates are advisory recommendations — each has a two-step documented override recorded in the generated clinical note and zero-PHI safety log
  • • COWS routing names the alternative induction pathway and clinician-discretion criteria explicitly

No blocking behavior remains in the engine: every safety gate surfaces a specific, actionable, guideline-cited recommendation that the clinician reviews and can accept or override, with the override logged. The only non-overridable rule is a pediatric gate blocking codeine/tramadol prescribing under age 12, per FDA Black Box warnings — regulator-originated, not engine judgment. A confirmatory classification memo from specialized health IT counsel is planned as Stage 3; it has not yet been commissioned or obtained, and the classification below should be read as self-assessed, not settled.

Criterion D Compliance Strategy

The "Glass Box" Design Philosophy

Why deterministic, traceable logic enables Non-Device classification while AI/ML approaches cannot.

Full Formula Transparency

Every MME conversion uses the published equianalgesic ratio from the CDC 2022 guideline. The formula, input values, and intermediate steps are displayed inline — not hidden behind a result card. A clinician can perform the same calculation on paper and arrive at the same answer.

One-Click Source Citations

Every clinical recommendation is hyperlinked to its source guideline. CDC 2022 for opioid dosing. NCCN 2025 for cancer pain. AGS Beers Criteria 2023 for geriatric thresholds. ASAM 2020 for OUD protocols. A clinician can independently verify any recommendation against primary literature in under 30 seconds.

Deterministic — Not AI/ML

No machine learning. No neural networks. No probabilistic inference. Every output is fully deterministic — given the same inputs, the same calculation runs every time. This eliminates the "black box" problem that prevents AI/ML CDS tools from achieving Non-Device classification.

Clinician Retains Full Autonomy

The software surfaces a specific, actionable, guideline-cited recommendation with full reasoning at the moment of prescribing; the clinician reviews it and can accept, adjust, or override it. The mandatory disclaimer on every session launch reinforces this. Every override is logged, recorded in the generated clinical note and the zero-PHI safety log. Only the pediatric gate (codeine/tramadol under 12, per FDA Black Box warnings) is non-overridable.

Non-Device CDS vs. SaMD 510(k) — Why This Matters

The classification decision is not just regulatory — it is strategic.

Dimension Non-Device CDS (Our Path) SaMD 510(k)
Time to Market Pending confirmatory counsel review 12–24 months
Regulatory Cost $10–25K (counsel + memo) — illustrative estimate $800K–$2M
Clinical Changes Rapid update on evidence New 510(k) submission per change
Ongoing Compliance Internal QMS documentation FDA post-market surveillance
AI/ML Features Not available (by design) Permitted under 510(k)

Regulatory Risk Surface

Three features were identified as Criterion D risks and resolved by design in June 2026 — converted from blocking behavior to advisory recommendations with documented overrides. They are kept here as the record of how each risk was retired, verified across the product's 250+ iOS clinical validation scenarios and 120+ backend pytest tests.

RESOLVED

Renal Gate — GFR-Gated Active Metabolites

The risk: for morphine in dialysis, the engine replaced the dose with a terminal AVOID — evidence-based (M3G/M6G accumulation toxicity), but blocking behavior that invited Criterion D scrutiny.

Resolution — Implemented June 2026

AVOID remains the default recommendation with full evidence display (NKF guidelines; M3G/M6G neurotoxicity). A two-step "Review Contraindication & Override" pathway reveals the unadjusted equianalgesic reference, explicitly labeled OVERRIDE — CONTRAINDICATED. The override is recorded in the generated clinical note, logged (zero-PHI), and resets whenever renal status changes. This mirrors how EHR-native advisories handle renally-cleared drugs.

RESOLVED

Pediatric Gate — Adult-Validation Boundary

The risk: for patients under 18, the calculator locked its entire interface — a constraint that went beyond the underlying FDA mandates and constituted engine-originated blocking.

Resolution — Implemented June 2026

The pediatric advisory now offers a two-step documented override into adult-reference mode: calculations proceed with a persistent warning that conversion factors are adult-validated (CDC 2022) and weight-based formulary verification is required. The override resets when the age changes. The narrow FDA-mandated contraindication — codeine/tramadol under age 12 (FDA Drug Safety Communication 2017) — remains enforced without override, because it is regulator-originated, not engine judgment.

RESOLVED

COWS Gate — Buprenorphine Induction Routing

The risk: the OUD Consult pathway routes by COWS score (ASAM 2020 + SAMHSA thresholds) to prevent precipitated withdrawal. The engine never blocked — it always produced an actionable plan — but the routing could be characterized as restricting clinical judgment.

Resolution — Implemented June 2026

Every below-threshold plan now states explicitly that the routing is an evidence-based recommendation, names the alternative (standard/high-dose induction per clinical judgment, with re-scoring and precipitated-withdrawal management guidance), and cites its sources inline (ASAM 2020; Herring 2021; SAMHSA 2021). "Wait and Assess" lists the Low-Dose Initiation alternative rather than a bare instruction to wait.

Regulatory Counsel Engagement — Stage 3

Before any EHR BPA integration with a hospital partner, Lifeline Medical Technologies will commission a formal FDA classification memo from specialized health IT counsel. With the advisory-override design in place, this is a confirmatory memo on a clean Non-Device CDS profile — not a defense of ambiguous blocking behavior — which materially reduces its cost and timeline. Hospital compliance teams and Epic certification reviewers expect counsel-signed classification documentation; this memo is that artifact.

Physician-Founded · Yale School of Medicine

Clinical Validation Roadmap

Five stages from internal development to live hospital deployment. The founder's Yale addiction medicine fellowship (began July 2026) anchors the academic validation pathway.

Stage 1 — Complete

Internal Engine Development

iOS app: 28,955 lines of clinical logic across 94 files (Swift 6, iOS 17+). 250+ automated clinical validation scenarios in the iOS validation suite, plus 120+ EHR backend pytest tests. A 10-rule deterministic safety engine, verified across both suites, plus OIRD risk scoring (PRODIGY), MME threshold logic, CDC naloxone co-prescribing prompts, and pharmacogenomic guidance. AGS Beers Criteria 2023 geriatric thresholds implemented.

Stage 2 — Active · July 2026

Independent Clinical Review — Yale

Founder is in Yale School of Medicine's addiction medicine fellowship (began July 2026) — the app's core clinical domain (OUD consult, MOUD induction, COWS, buprenorphine protocols). Yale's addiction medicine faculty are targeted as potential co-investigators for a quality improvement validation study, expected/anticipated to qualify for IRB-exempt status, subject to Yale's own IRB determination. Clinical logic review against institutional protocol standards.

Stage 3 — Planned

Regulatory Counsel Review

Commission a confirmatory FDA classification memo from specialized health IT counsel on the advisory-override architecture (all former hard stops resolved by design, June 2026). Establish Quality Management System documentation and pre-deployment checklist for EHR partners.

Stage 4 — Planned

Targeted QI Pilot (IRB Determination Pending)

Planned 90-day observational quality improvement study at a target academic medical center — no site or partner is confirmed as of this writing. Proposed safety metrics: OIRD rate, high-MME prescribing rate, safety-gate trigger rate, documented override rate. Anticipated to qualify for an IRB-exempt QI designation (no PHI retained, no experimental intervention), subject to that institution's own IRB review and determination.

Stage 5 — Planned

Epic Integration Certification

Full SMART on FHIR + CDS Hooks live deployment. Epic sandbox validation → hospital staging environment → limited floor pilot → system-wide rollout. Epic Connection Hub listing application for broader institutional discovery.

Questions About Regulatory Fit?

Whether you're evaluating integration from a compliance, legal, or clinical informatics perspective — we have detailed documentation on our classification rationale, HIPAA architecture, and quality management approach.